The obligation of homeowners to comply with the rules
Hosted by TVDM Consultants on 14 August 2024
For more information please contact us on 061 536 3138 or email us as info@tvdmconsultants.com.
Speaker Information:
Zerlinda van der Merwe | TVDM Consultants
Watch the webinar here:
Due to the popularity of our previous webinar with Antony Arvan from Maurice Phillips | Wisenberg Attorneys, Notaries & Conveyancers, we invited him back to co-host our August Webinar!
He dealt with:
- The obligation of homeowners to comply with the rules, by revisiting Mount Edgecombe.
- To what extent the obligation to pay levies is cast in stone.
The obligation to comply with rules of a Homeowners’ Association:
Bushwillow Park Home Owners v Fernandes and Others (2014/31526) [2015] ZAGPJHC 250
BILL v WATERFALL ESTATE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION NPC AND ANOTHER 2020 (6) SA 145 (GJ)
KINGSHAVEN HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION v BOTHA AND OTHERS 2023 (4) SA 187 (WCC)
The obligation to comply with the rules of a body corporate:
BODY CORPORATE, SHAFTESBURY SECTIONAL TITLE SCHEME v RIPPERT'S ESTATE AND OTHERS 2003 (5) SA 1 (C)
BODY CORPORATE, PADDOCK SECTIONAL TITLE SCHEME v NICHOLL 2020 (2) SA 472 (GJ)
Levies in Homeowners’ Associations:
Kingsmead Office Park Owners Association v Shasri Investments CC [2012] JOL 29586 (KZD)
Levies in Sectional Title Schemes:
BODY CORPORATE OF FISH EAGLE v GROUP TWELVE INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD 2003 (5) SA 414 (W)
Dolphin Ridge Body Corporate v Express Model Trading 289 CC [2012] ZAWCHC 111
1. ZIKALALA v BODY CORPORATE, SELMA COURT AND ANOTHER 2022 (2) SA 305 (KNP)